From The
New York Times:
Everybody's
Business
Note to the New Treasury Secretary:
It's
Time to Raise Taxes
by BEN STEIN
Published:
June 25, 2006
To: Mr. Henry
M. Paulson Jr., The Goldman Sachs Group
Dear Mr. Paulson:
You almost certainly don't remember little me, but I met you many
years ago when you worked on what I think was the Domestic Council
under the redoubtable John D. Ehrlichman. Even then, you were
an intense and clearly brilliant young man. Since then, time has
proven you to be a brilliant and intense middle-aged man. To become
chairman of an empire like Goldman Sachs is a spectacular achievement
by any measure.
But now you
have your work cut out for you as Treasury secretary. You are
facing what is, in many ways, the most dangerous economic future
since the Depression. Danger is coming on many fronts, only dimly
seen by the powers that be in Washington, and your insights and
eloquence will be urgently necessary.
Just to give
you an idea what you are up against, Standard & Poor's issued
a warning not long ago. The caution was that if the United States
government did not seriously alter fiscal policy, Treasury bonds
would be downgraded to BBB, slightly above junk status, by 2020.
This is a stunning piece of news for the world's most highly rated
security denominated in its primary reserve currency. The S.&
P. report said further that if the nation did not make serious
changes after that, by 2025 Treasuries would be junk bonds, like
the bonds of less successful emerging-markets nations.
These downgrades
would occur because the federal budget deficit and the cumulative
national debt would be so high relative to the gross domestic
product. This debt would presumably come largely from Social Security
and Medicare obligations, considered sacred contracts by American
taxpayers. (The statement said similar downgrades would also happen
to other major countries in the developed world that have large
aging populations.)
Just to get
an idea of the size of the structural cumulative deficit for Medicare
alone, Phil DeMuth, along with others, has calculated that the
total Medicare obligations for the balance of this century, if
brought down to net present value at the long-term bond rate,
would exceed the wealth of the entire nation. This means that
if you sold every home, every farm, every factory, every business
in America and invested the money in something that returned as
much as long-term bonds, there would not be enough to pay for
the foreseeable Medicare expenditures of this nation in the 21st
century. And that's not counting Social Security or the military
or the interest on the debt or the livelihood of 300 million Americans.
Can you imagine,
Mr. Paulson, what it will mean to Americans in terms of our currency's
value, in terms of the interest we will have to pay to foreign
creditors, if our bonds reach junk status? Can you imagine just
how crippling a burden this will be on taxpayers?
It gets worse.
The annual trade deficit with the rest of the world is approaching
$1 trillion. It's not there yet, but we're on our way. This means
we have to transfer ownership of roughly $1 trillion of our assets
to foreigners every year to cover our excess of international
purchases over sales. But the total worth of all the assets in
the United States is not greatly more than $50 trillion. To be
sure, it rises annually. But even so, we are basically transferring
the value of an average of one of our 50 states to foreign investors
every year. This trend looks unsustainable to me (unless we are
to revert to being a colony this time, of China).
Again, the
downgrades and the deficits in the current account and the federal
budget will have major effects on the dollar's value, which will
mean major inflationary effects. If experience is any guide, these
effects will slow real economic growth.
Right now,
inflation is moving out of the Federal Reserve's comfort zone.
The Fed chairman, Ben S. Bernanke, is doing the right thing by
raising rates and trying to slow the overheated economy, but in
a way that does not bring us a recession. To give us a soft landing
without recession or stagflation rising inflation and slow
growth, as we had in a good part of the 1970's is not an
easy or assured task.
To raise rates
enough to slow down our economy and thus bring down commodity
prices amid skyrocketing demand in developing economies is certainly
not easy. To do this correctly, you'd need to be a brain surgeon
of monetary policy and a cardiac ace of fiscal policy. In other
words, there is a great, great deal to be worried about.
May I respectfully
suggest that in this environment, ending the estate tax is not
a major sensible priority? May I suggest that having the lowest
taxes in 65 years on high-income taxpayers is not really as prudent
as it might be if we were not running stupendous deficits, with
far worse in the future?
I know you
are a Republican, and so am I. Now and then, scornful fellow Republicans
ask me what kind of Republican I am, since I'm for higher taxes
on the rich. I tell them that I am an Eisenhower Republican, the
kind who wants to leave a healthier America to posterity. That
includes an economy not headed for the status of a banana republic's
economy.
Now, I know
that a truly great man, Ronald Wilson Reagan, when asked if he
were not worried that his tax cuts would burden posterity with
a heavy weight, supposedly asked, "What has posterity ever
done for me?" Those of us with teenage children certainly
know what he meant. But the problem is no longer quite as funny.
The fiscal
house is in severe disorder. I love President Bush, and I believe
that he wants to do the right thing. I know for sure that Karl
Rove is a genius and wants to do the right thing as he sees it
(which may well be totally different from how I see it). Mr. Bernanke
knows what's right and wrong. You will have allies. But someone
needs to take a stand, and that person might as well be you.
The time is
always right to do right, and now is a good time to start. This
one will make running Goldman Sachs look easy.
Respectfully
submitted,
Ben Stein