From The
New York Times:
EVERYBODY'S
BUSINESS
The Tale of
the Toaster, or How Trade Deficits Are Good
By BEN STEIN
Published:
April 25, 2004
SEE that Chinese-made toaster on the shelf at Wal-Mart that sells
for $6.87, while the one made in America, on sale at your local
kitchen and wine shop, costs $49.99? There is a story there, and
it's not a bad story at all - or at least not an all-bad story.
Plug in the
toaster, slide in an English muffin and pay attention. By the
time the muffin is crisp, you will have learned something.
If you are
a factory worker whose job has just been sent to Guangdong, you
probably do not have kind feelings about Chinese manufacturers.
If you are an automobile assembly line worker (as my grandfather
was) whose factory is on shaky ground because of the torrent of
Japanese imports, you may not feel madly in love with the Japanese.
Few people want to lose their jobs. But if you are an ordinary
American consumer or investor, you may want to connect the dots
and see just what it means that the United States imports so incredibly
much from China and Japan and how, in many ways, it is a substantial
benefit to the American consumer and especially to the investor
- at least in the short run.
As everyone knows, the United States runs very large trade deficits
with many countries, but let's focus on China and Japan. The trade
deficits mean that the Chinese and the Japanese collect a vast
hoard of dollars by selling us toasters and other products, but
that they do not spend nearly as much here buying cow hides, lumber,
wheat and whatnot. They take these unspent dollars, turn them
in to the central banks of their countries and get their local
currencies to pay their workers and pay their mortgages.
The central
banks then take all those dollars, or a lot of them, and buy Treasury
securities in the United States. Japan loves Treasuries: in the
last year, it has been buying those bonds at a rate of about $20
billion a month. To be sure, part of this has been to keep the
dollar high and thus encourage additional American purchases of
Japanese goods, but much of the reason is that Treasuries are
a remarkably safe investment in terms of return of principal.
Japan now
holds roughly one-sixth of all Treasury debt, or more than $600
billion of it. China has bought much less but still owns about
$170 billion of the stuff and is adding a few billion dollars
a month. (I am indebted to my statistician friend, Phil DeMuth,
head of Conservative Wealth Management, for this data.)
This may seem
scary, and, in a way, it is. It means that we citizens are paying
a good chunk of our income tax each year for interest on debt
owned by the Chinese and the Japanese.
But there
are legions of positive effects from their bond buying and the
large trade surpluses that their countries are running with the
United States - and will continue to run, even if their commodities
prices rise, because their labor costs will remain less.
First, their
bond purchases help keep American interest rates low. Their voracious
appetite for Treasury bonds props up the price and lowers the
rate. That is a benefit for every borrower - every man or woman
applying for a mortgage, every business wanting to finance a microchip
plant. (And even after recent run-ups, rates remain low by historical
standards.)
To the extent
that the United States avoided a deep recession after the bubble
burst in 2000, we owe some thanks to the nice people in Beijing
and Tokyo who recycled those dollars. The stimulus to economic
activity is hard to measure, but it is all good - unless you are
a retiree wanting higher interest rates on your savings. Then
it's not good.
Low interest
rates help the stock market, too. The value of a stock is generally
considered to be its flow of dividends or earnings far into the
future, discounted back to the present at current rates of interest.
If current interest rates are low, there is far less of a discount
applied to those earnings and dividends. That makes the market
rise. If rates are low, stocks seem cheap compared with bonds;
this also props up stock prices.
Exporting
countries like China and Japan also help to keep rates low because
they have such efficient industrial machines and sell goods cheaply
here. As prices stay low, the Federal Reserve is less tempted
than it might be otherwise to raise rates to fight inflation.
When you get your brokerage statement - and if it looks good -
you may want to thank the Chinese and the Japanese.
Again, that
may seem a burden for American manufacturing workers who have
to compete with lower-paying foreign manufacturers, and it is.
But for consumers, prices are kept low by the deluge of imports.
Not every American is a manufacturing worker, but every American
is a consumer, so we all benefit in some way.
BUT how long
can this go on? How long can we run trade deficits in the neighborhood
of $600 billion a year? What happens when the Chinese and the
Japanese have bought all of the Treasury debt - or when our securities
market is heavily dominated by Asian buyers? Will we become, in
essence, a colony of China and Japan, working a large part of
the year to pay the interest and dividends on the bonds and stocks
owned in those countries?
In a way,
that's the problem of the Chinese and the Japanese. At some point,
if you owe the bank enough money, you own the bank. And we can
always print more money to pay the interest on the debt. Anyway,
that is a long way off. And to those who say that running this
kind of trade deficit cannot go on forever, I offer the words
of my late, great father, Herbert Stein, when asked about this
very problem. "If a thing cannot go on forever," he
said, "it will stop."